Quantum Debates part II

 Ok I realise in the last post some people will say well what about the collapse of the wavefunction and the violation of the Bell inqualities don't they show that quantum mechanics is weird. I have covered this in many posts before but to save you looking here is a recap 

Let's take the so called collapse of the wavefunction first. This is usually illustrated by the so called cat paradox. If a quantum system can occupy a number of possible states then prior to measurement the sysrem is said to be in a superposition of states and on the usual story this means that when a measurement is made the so called wave function of the system collapses into one of the possible states with a given probability. Those who see the so called wave function as something more than the square root of a probability density function then make the leap to say that the measurement has caused the system to change from it's superposition to a single state. So there is something special about measurement and indeed quantum mechanics via this so called collapse vindicates idealism. So that we create reality by acts of measurement something which is alleged to be part of the Copenhagen interpretation which in fact it isn't. This should really be called the 'California Interpretation' and if it were true would indeed be weird and mysterious and all those who like to link Buddhism or Transcendental meditation with quantum mechanics would be vindicated. 

But this is totally unnecessary, lets take the classical situation for any statistical event if I know the underlying probability density function which summarises all the possiblities and I pick a given sample then I can calculate the probability that that person has a given height or a particular number will turn up if I throw a dice or spin a roulette wheel. Prior to the outcome I did not know what the outcome would be after the outcome I do. Thus the probability density function has 'collapsed' to give the particular outcome but all that is saying is that for classical systems the probability density function summarises all the possible outcomes and after the event has occured the outcome was realised with the given probability. I would argue the same is true of quantum mechanics before a measurement is made I do not know what the result would be but only the total outcomes with a given probability which if I know the appropriate solution to Schrodinger's wave equation I can calculate via the Born rule. Thus the superposition is not a real superposition but just a summary of possible outcomes of a measurement with the appropriate outcomes. The cat is definitely alive or dead before I open the box all I have done is updated my knowledge of the situation before hand. Opening the box hasn't caused the cat to be alive or dead but whether the radioactive poison was released or not. Something you could estimate if you know the half life of the radioactive material. All of this is consistent with quantum mechanics and how it is applied to calculate the probabilities of certain things happening and there is no need to invoke the collapse of the wavefunction to explain this process. 

In contrast to other realist interpretations such as those invoking hidden variables or the Many Worlds interpretaton nothing is added to the formalism. There is no need to invoke many worlds in a desperate attempt to maintain realism. My solution is robustly realist because the entities to which quantum mechanics is applied electrons, atoms and all the various exotic particles and there interactions are seen as real. Once one accepts that the so called wavefunction isn't anything physical but related to the probability density function via the Born rule, then there is no need to agonise whether or not the wave function is a physical object defined in (3N+1)*S space-time-spin dimensions for an N body system it makes no sense as a physical object but as a probability density function it makes a lot of sense. So by sticking to the statistical interpretation of Born then we can retain a fairly robust realism about the entities to which quantum mechanics is applied to and there is no need to worry about any form of idealism or mysticism. 

I'll talk about the Bell inequalities in a later post. But I defy anyone who disagrees with my perspective to show that my position is inconsistent with quantum mechanics. One can never observe a physical superposition of states because by definition any observation would collapse the wavefunction into one of the possible eigenstates. Those who claim otherwise are simply collating the reuslts of various measurements and claiming that this represents a real superposition. 

 

Quantum Debates

 Ok this poem is a rant against the endless debates about the alleged meaning of quantum mechanics. A debate I regard as totally pointless as the main issues were all settled by the following two rules of interpretation

1) The Borm rule which says that the modulus squared of the solution to Schrodinger's equation, when suitably normalised gives rise to a probability density function from which wc can calculate the expectation value of any variable. Conversely this means that the solution to Schrodinger's equation is effectively the square root of a probability density function not a real wave.

2) The link between the eigenvalues of the solution to Schrodinger's equation and the energy levels of the system under consideration. 

These rules are readily extendible to relativistic equations 

That really is all you need. plus the ability to use Schrodinger's equation or it's relativistic generalisation to understand the results of experiments and from which all the great successes of quantum mechanics have been applied to and which help us understand how nature works. 

 The rest whether or not the solution to Schrodinger's equation is a real wave in 3N+1 dimensional space time or merely a mathematical object which enables the probability that certain events will happen to be calculated or the energy levels of a system to be obtained. Whether there are multiple universess and so forth have nothing to do with physics at all. To coin a phrase quantum mechanics isn't mystical it is just statistical. 

Once the implications of this are accepted then much of the so called debate just dissolves. If there are no hidden variables then we can only have a statistical solution. But this does not mean that particles or their interactions are not real. just that their so called wave functions are not real, but only as real as say the Gaussian Distribution describing the distribution of heights of a collection of human beings in a sufficiently large enough sample.

 Instead of worrying about the meaining of the wave function try and apply the well trodden path of discovering the correct Hamiltonian to describe particles and how they interact with each other once this has been obtained just get on and calculate the consequences. If your Hamiltonian agrees with experimental results, then brilliant you have understood a part of nature. No amount of agonising about whether or not the solution to Schrodinger's equation is a real wave,. or signals travel faster than the speed of life is going to add one iota to the new knowledge. So let's celebrate all those physicists and chemists who daily apply quantum mechanics to understanding the world around us. Rather than the parasitic journalists and philosophers and I am afraid some prominent scientists such as Jim Al Khalili who jump on the band wagon of claiming that quantum mechanics is difficult to understand or mysterious. 

If you want to understand how quantum mechanics works, learn how to solve Schrodinger's equation or any of the relativistic equations don't waste your time reading what is essentially gibberish. Anyway here is my rant 

Quantum Debates

 

                                                  Many thoughts about you abound,

                                            Some of them seeming quite profound.

                                            But it’s all an illusion,

                                            Just adding to our confusion.

 

                                            It’s not mystical,

                                            It’s just statistical.

                                            Time to end this silly debate,

                                            And get on and calculate. 

Example of a silly debate about the meaning of quantum mechanics, that is going nowhere IMHO and there are plenty more around unfortunately. 

Spherical Harmonics

Todays poem is about Spherical Harmonics, just as any function in rectangular coordinates can be expressed as a Fourier Series in Trigonometric functions and in Cylindrical coordinates we can expand any function in terms of Bessel Functions. So in spherical coordinates it is possible to express any function as a series in Spherical Harmonics. Naturally then this expansion  has been applied to spherical waves, the calculation of the fields outside a sphere which leads to a series of Polynomials called Legendre polynomials. One of the most exciting application is to the calculation of the angular dependence of the wave function of the hydrogen atom. It is often thought that because the "waves" are quantised that this is unique to quantum systems however this is mistaken. Any spherical wave be it classical or quantum is quantised in the sense that depending on the size of the sphere only a certain set pf standing waves are available. 

Of course the biggest misconception about the so called wavefunction of the hydrogen atom is the fact that many people think they are really waves. Well as I have argued many times in quantum mechanics the so called waves are really probability density functions. Despite the misleading pictures of orbitals of the hydrogen atom the electron is not spread out over all space as they would seem to imply. Like any probability density function they just represent the probability that an electron of a certain energy will be seen at a certain place with a given probability. The surfaces represent the boundary at which the electron is likely to be found upto 95% of the time. But an electron is essentially a small point like particle with a definite mass, intrinsic spin and charge. Quantum mechanics does not change this picture. Also it should be remembered that the probability density functions are three dimensional functions so the electron is not in an orbit at all. But can be anywhere within that three dimensional region. Calling these three dimensional probability density functions orbitals is just so misleading. Matters are not helped by energy level diagrams showing the electron jumping from one energy level to another. But it must be remembered that these are energy level  diagrams not positional diagrams. An electron does not jump from one energy level to another. It just changes energy and with each energy level the form of the probability density function changes. 

Anyway having said that Spherical Harmonics just like Bessel Functions are truly amazing functions. There are a whole load of other 'Special Functions' associated with the differential equations of mathematical physics, but anyone who masters the mathematical properties of Spherical Harmonics and Bessel functions will be well placed to understand a lot of physics. 

Finally it is of interest to note that the Spectrum of the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation has been expressed in terms of Spherical Harmonics. Also via the Spherical Harmonic addition theorem there is a close link between Spherical Harmonics and Bessel Functions another example of the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas. Here is my tribute to them 

                                                        Spherical Harmonics

 

                                        Many uses we have found,

                                    For your functions so profound.

                                    The fields inside a sphere,

                                    Have become very clear.

 

                                    You describe the spectrum,

                                    Of an atoms angular momentum.

                                    And the background radiation,

                                    That comes from natures creation. 

        Probability density funtions of an electron outside a hydrogen atom 

                                              

 

Ode to Bessel Functions

Ok here is what I believe is the first ever poem to be published on Bessel Functions. Those who studied partial differential equations will know that if a function is expressed in cylindrical coordinates the separation of variables technique will usually end up with one of the equations resulting in Bessel's equations, named after Bessel who first came across it when investigating planetary ,motion. If the equation is solved by assuming a series solution by the Froebenius method a set of orthogonal functions is obtained called Bessel Functions. These are essentially similar to cosines and sines in rectangular coordinates and any function in cylindrical coordinates can be expressed in terms of them. 

Since their discovery (or invention) they have been used for all sorts of purposes to model the acoustic waves in a cylindrical tube, the electromagnetic waves in a cylinder, heat conduction in a cylinder and many other things so it is important to become familiar with them, Unfortunately the Open University Applied  maths and physics courses only mention them in passing and their properties are hardly developed. A good little book although out of print but easy to find on Amazon which discusses Bessel functions and their properties is by Sneddon 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Special-functions-mathematical-physics-chemistry/dp/B00316KJ0Q

 Perhaps the most amazing application of Bessel Functions was their use by Crick to deduce the diffraction pattern of the Double Helix. He realised that if DNA was a helix then it's diffraction pattern could be expressed in terms of Bessel Functions. Resulting in a 'Saltire' like pattern as shown in the photograph below. What is even more amazing was the fact that if there were two helices intertwined with each other then the 4 peak would be minimised and again this can be seen in the photograph below. So there we have it almost definitive proof that DNA the molecule of life is a double helix and ultimately dating back to Bessel's Functions

I have to add a sorry note to this marvelous tale, the woman who did all the hatd work in obtaining the diffraction photographs was a French woman called Rosalind Franklin, Being a women she was treated really appallingly and Watson in his book makes some quite sexist remarks about her. Alsu unfortunately she died at a fairly young age too late to get any credit when the Nobel prize was awarded. So just as in the case of Jocelyn Bell, sexist males got all the credit for a woman's work. There was a very good Horizon programme about this made in the mid 1980's I don't know if it is still available if you can get a copy it is definitely worth trying to track down. 

Anyway here is the tribute to Mr Bessel and his amazing set of functions 

                                                        Bessel

                                            What an amazing function,

                                            We can use it without compunction.

                                            Any field that’s in a tube,

                                            You have put it in the groove.

 

                                            Aided by your Function,

                                            Franklin, Crick and Watson,

                                            After a long, long trial,

                                            Deduced life’s double spiral.

 

Rosalind Franklin's photograph of DNA, note the missing peak this indicates that there are two helices interwined with each other. 

Mr Fourier and his series

 One of the marvels of mathematics is the Fourier series which shows how to either decompse a complex function into a sum of sines and cosines or vice versa build up a complex function by summing over various sines and cosine functions. This idea has many applications in partial differential equations and any function expressed in rectangular co-ordinates can be expressed in terms of them. The separate sine and cosine terms can be seen as vectors in a function space. In that they are orthogonal to each other thus there is a an amazing analogy between geometric vectors and vectors in function space. This can be extended to other coordinate systems as we shall see in the next two poems. One of the most amazing application of Fourier series is the ability to synthesize complex sounds and make new music. An application that I bet Fourier never thought of. So next time you are struggling to solve a problem in Fourier series just remember how useful they can be. Here is the tribute. 

Mr Fourier

 

You discovered something quite profound,

How to create a complex sound.

From it’s component bits,

To make a wave that fits.

 

All these waves combine,

Into a sound that’s fine.

The possibilities are endless,

To create sounds quite stupendous.

A Moog synthesiser must be much more fun playing around with one of these than the digital synthesisers which you can generate using a computer A concrecte application of Fourier series. 

  

 

Ode To Calculus

 The next few posts will be a tribute to mathematics or more strictly the branches of maths that are useful to physicists. For physicists as a whole mathematics is secondary to nature. It is a moot question whether maths is discovered or created. I tend to the view that it is essentially created which no doubt will surprise people after all I am a scientitst and I use mathematics every day and it works so it must be true. Well to some extent, but mathematics can only ever provide a good approximation to an underlying reality. Anyone who has solved a differential equation will know that of all the possible solutions only one will represent the reality that one is trying to model. Certainly it is amazing how given a few basic facts about the world mathematics can extend the relationships and maybe even uncover relatiohnships that we didn't think were there. Maxwell's equations for example. 

But let's not get carried away there are certain constraints on the world. Signals cannot travel faster than the speed of light, there are only 4 space time dimensions, there is only one universe. Any theory such as superstrings or the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics which contradict those basic facts is just fantasy and should be called out as such.Also no amount of mathematical reasoning will explain why the Gravitational coupling constant is what it is or the mass of the electron or any fundamental particle. These are givens and any mathematics which claims otherwise is just over reaching itself. There is no need to invoke as some people do God or the anthtopic principle to explain why the world is the way it is, ii just is. Of course once we know some basic facts we can use mathematics to deduce inter-relationships between those facts and that is amazing. One of the reasons it works so well is that nature is approximately linear and calculus exploirs this linearity

Without the invention (discovery) if you prefer of calculus there would be no explanation of the world as it is.  As it was when  Newton and Leibniz invented calculus the laws of motion were explained and the fact that planets moved in ellipses was also deduced thus being one of the greatest intellectual achievements of mankind. The Open university used to include a couple of units in the old course MST209 which has been superseded by MST210 from which this has been dropped. I think that is a pity if anyone reading this blog would like a copy of the missing units please contact me on 

chrisf19572002@yahoo.co.uk 

as it is one of the greatest intellectual achievements of mankind. If you want to understand how physics works then you really must learn some calculus I think it a shame that the currrent Open university course in physics S217 minimizes the use of calculus in it's units. It is often claimed by Arts students that you are ignorant if you haven't read a certain book or watched say a certain Shakespeare play, Well conversely I would argue that if you don't know calculus to at least A level maths and why physicists use it to explain how nature works you are equally just as ignorant. Anyway here is my tribute to one of the greatest inventions of mathematics 

Calculus

You explain how nature works,

It’s a task we should not shirk.

Integration and Differentiation

Gives me such exhiliration¹⁾

 

All the laws of motion,

Are explained without commotion.

When we’ve mastered you,

There is so much we can do.

 

1)    I realise not everyone feels the same way J

Jocelyn Bell

 This poem pays a tribute to Jocelyn Bell who with the aid of her phased array antenna the she built and maintained  (Radio telescope) discovered Pulsars  At first she noticed a small amount of persistent noise in her plots which she jokingly referred to as LGM (little Green men). The pulses were regularly and quite rapid. For a while there was speculation that they may indeed be signals from outer space and of course the media latched on to it. However it was soon realised that they could in fact be neutron stars and this was later confirmed. A neutron star is a much more compact object than a white dwarf and represents another stable state of stellat collapse. Oppenheimer and his student Volkoff had worked out that one of the implications of General relativity was indeed this new stable state. One of the signals of a neutron star is the fact that it rotates rapidly (due to conservation of angular momentum) hence the short bursts that Jocelyn Bell measured. In one of the great scandals despite having done all the work it was her supervisor that got the credit and the subsequent Nobel prize. This is typical of the sexism that prevailed in those days and probably still lingers on today. Jocelyn Bell continued to develop her career as an Astrophysicist and was for a time Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics for the Open University. As I am an antenna engineer it would be interesting if I can find out the details of Jocelyn Bell's antenna and plot some typical radiation patterns watch this space

Anyway her is my tribute to her 

Jocelyn Bell

 

What was that strange pulse from the stars,

Could it be little men from Mars.

No it was a star so dense,

Made of neutrons with mass immense.

 

Spinning round so fast,

Emitting pulses in a blast.

This marvel you found,

With your antenna on the ground.